An International Ecological Discourse Analysis of China's Image in the Reporting of the China-US Trade War
PDF

Keywords

Transitivity; China-US Trade War; International Ecological Discourse Analysis; National Image

How to Cite

Hu, T. (2025). An International Ecological Discourse Analysis of China’s Image in the Reporting of the China-US Trade War . International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(7), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i7.1081

Abstract

Since the Trump administration took office again in 2025, the combined impact of trade imbalances and political factors has escalated China - US trade frictions. Analyzing The New York Times' coverage of the China - US trade dispute offers insights into how US media shapes China's image. Consequently, this study combined quantitative and qualitative research, guided by the transitivity theory in systemic functional linguistics and the international ecological philosophy of "harmony and diversity, mutual benefits and love", it constructed a small-scale corpus from The New York Times' reports on China - US trade issues post Trump's 2025 presidency. Using Word Smith Tools 9.0, it extracted semantic networks of verb collocations in the "China + V" material process structure to summarize China's actor image and explored the ecological representation of this image, revealing the international ecological philosophies of China and the US reflected in the discourse. The study found that in terms of "China + V" material processes, The New York Times portrayed China as a "tariff imposer," "strong retaliator," and "crisis manager." The ecological representation of these images was predominantly destructive, followed by neutral and beneficial discourse. The findings imply that China advocates mutual benefits, independence, and autonomy, while the US is linked to hegemonism. This research enriches the application of transitivity and promotes the development of a more objective, fair, and rational international ecological discourse system. 

https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i7.1081
PDF

References

Akram, N., & Yasmin, M. (2024). Media portrayal of sexual violence in Pakistan: A critical discourse analysis of the Lahore-Sialkot motorway incident. Women’s Studies International Forum, 106, 102955. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WSIF.2024.102955

Akram, N., Yasmin, M., & Sohail, A. (2025). Perpetuation of rape myths through news reporting on intimate partner violence: A transitivity analysis of the Asma Aziz case. Women’s Studies International Forum, 109, 103038. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WSIF.2024.103038

Alexander, R., & Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104–110.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011

Bell, R. T. (1991). Translation and translating: Theory and practice. Longman.

Bounding, K. (1959). National images and international systems. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(2), 120–131.

Boughen, R. (2021). Ecological Civilization Discourse in Xinhua’s African Newswires: Towards a Greener Agency. African Journalism Studies, 1–15.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2021.1927783

Bookchin, M. (1981). The ecology of freedom: The emergency and dissolution of hierarchy. Cheshire Books.

Cao, J., & Yang, M. T. (2022). Ecological discourse analysis of online news based on transitivity system. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences), 59(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.16783/j.cnki.nwnus.2022.02.014

Chen, L. J. (2019). An Eco-discourse Analysis of Pastoral Poems from the Perspective of Transitivity: A Case Study of Tao Yuanming’s Back to Country Life I and Its English Versions. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 40(1), 23–32.

https://doi.org/10.16482/j.sdwy37-1026.2019-01-003

Cheng, Q. L. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional grammar. Shantou University Press.

Crutzen, P. J., Fall, R., Galbally, I. E., & Lindinger, W. L. (1999). Parameters for global ecosystem models. Nature, 401(6736), 535. https://doi.org/10.1038/21098

Dai, Y. J., Huang, L. K., & Zhao, Y. N. (2023). A Study of the Construction of China's Legal Image in Translating Chinese Classics: Examples from the English Translations of Jin Cang in Guanzi. Foreign Languages Research, 40(4), 66–71.

https://doi.org/10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2023.04.017

Fan, J. J. (2005). A review of ecolinguistics research. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (2), 110–115.

https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=VQ0ntgfwFMRPTcxhRCbNityKXYKpft4CqT9O1pg1V3VLczPR74WJaBHwtm0ekaSfE5NGE9BnLNjePpnh_j-UVhzOi-bRDB34e7iA235B3osRNpCTHB9UFY1TzKcpdkgv0OsFrQiabBbFapQ58ZwnNBV1lgzToT5CGEH4CWBY44_O6wfyGSJ9FQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Fawcett, R. P. (2009). The functional semantics handbook: Analyzing English at the level of meaning. Equinox.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 17, 241–292.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 37–81.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1968). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part III. Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 179–215.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1971). Literary style: A symposium. Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar (1st ed.). Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Han, J. (2013). A review of ecological linguistics research in China. Language Teaching and Research, (4), 107–112.

https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=VQ0ntgfwFMQod931cehghIJTvMx5m52mmBa1nyxA-jf9cyA0Dx6zxlIrunc-AOFI82hG2JUTiIh3mdl8dHcx2DoaL0D2IX7YLhrOxNpUFbgYiX_c4hefO5vepdAVGX_ZQDJd_Z0raGwbJ48IBR0nbLlvrmJyYG3A239xFIDwWxOD7UJpSzf5jg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

He, W., & Wei, R. (2017). Construction of transitivity analysis model for international ecological discourse. Modern Foreign Languages, 40(5), 597–607+729.

http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1165.H.20170726.1451.012.html

He, W., & Wei, R. (2017). The connotation and research direction of international ecological discourse. Foreign Languages Research, 34(5), 18–24.

https://doi.org/10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2017.05.005

He, W., & Wei, R. (2018). The Paradigm of Discourse Analyses and the Theoretical Foundation of Ecological Discourse Analysis. Contemporary Rhetoric, (5), 63–73.

https://doi.org/10.16027/j.cnki.cn31-2043/h.2018.05.008

Huang, G. W. (2016). The rise and development of ecolinguistics. China Foreign Languages, 13(1), 9–12.

https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2016.01.001

Huang, G. W., & Zhao, R. H. (2017). On the origin, aims, principles and methodology of eco-discourse analysis. Modern Foreign Languages, 40(5), 585–596.

https://link.cnki.net/urlid/44.1165.H.20170726.1449.010

Jarvis, R. (1989). The logic of images in international relations. Columbia University Press.

Kashif, F., Farooqi, R., Tariq, S., Nusrat, A., Ashraf, F., & Raees, A. (2022). A transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s third presidential debate. Heliyon, 8(9), e10518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10518

Kunczik, M. (1996). Images of nations and international public relations. Routledge.

Liang, J. Y., & Li, D. J. (2020). Metaphorical framework analysis of China's image: A case study of The Economist's social and legal reports. Foreign Language and Literature, 36(2), 96–106.

https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=VQ0ntgfwFMR7y7Ng6ewy4YWSo4CI3624ZNDSiKG7NUF_J0Jliz1MYHmcSIrmrE8StM_O_1nx-46yw7DssyhMmVK-TPPzbkmWd-66CgvSxO9U5uVH5II-Os8FirKsJy7xIUS2YhPco71lermJM4tS46waFshfDvH82HJ7t43HRAJTYZf-Y6hyrA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Liu, D. J. (2022). A corpus-based comparative and diachronic study of multi-source discourses: The representation and reception of “Chinese Dream” in the US, UK and India (2012—2020). Foreign Language Education, 43(1), 17–22.

https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2022.01.003

Liu, W. Y., & Mao, W. W. (2020). A Corpus Assisted Discourse Analysis of China's Image in African Newspaper Media. Foreign Languages Research, 37(2), 9–15, 55.

https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2020.02.002

Lu, S., & Hou, J. B. (2024). A Study on National Image Construction in Report to the 20th National Congress of the CPC from the Perspective of Evidentiality. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University (Social Sciences), (3), 81–89.

https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=VQ0ntgfwFMQwu4G5skRL8qCOw0beisYXnzhOVFTQu0Tb16sZS5Pd7qtp_o8_-sUogzGjRv_j6689w7ZeCQpV3nYNTcudPtfN3wP4JOE4xcfy1RYYgEN6LaivuzGafT_83FzMsFJDaQdhm1XDwA6io8XvCISrP0WxIxMFw_LN7I_Mcnno_Y6gRg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Ma, W. L., & Cui, Y. J. (2020). A Corpus-Based Study on China's National Image: A Transitivity Perspective. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (5), 114–121, 17.

https://doi.org/10.20139/j.issn.1001-5795.2020.05.016

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. International Language Science Publishers.

Niu, J. J., & Niu, G. L. (2022). An Interventional System Based Analysis of the International Ecological Discourse in the “Elephants Migration in Yunnan Province”. Journal of Hubei University of Science and Technology, 42(4), 84–89.

https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16751/j.cnki.hbkj.2022.04.004

Shi, X. Y., & Huang, L. B. (2021). A corpus-based study on translating Mao Zedong's works and constructing national images. Foreign Language Education, 42(3), 75–81.

https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2021.03.013

Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. Routledge.

Short, M. H. (1976). Why we sympathize with Lennie. MAE Journal, 1–9.

Stibbe, A. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis and Ecology: the search for new stories to live by. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse analysis (pp. 497–509). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-34

Suttle, C. A. (2007). Marine viruses—Major players in the global ecosystem. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(10), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1750

Tang, L. P., Zhu, T. T., & Yang, L. F. (2024). A research on China's image of economic rise in the U.S. broadsheets: A corpus-based transitivity perspective of “what did China do to X”. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, (6), 20–33.

https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=VQ0ntgfwFMRJajqhlkTVGRO7OqLDdmF203UnqXigJxSWkXKHBMygfGNIa52zXmUQnWdU5rbq3Qdde5NjRIboF9AJrQAuNg896aq87KSqQYqPEqUff2u95yvH8RTiWOVsopT2AVqLTWVgARkzUQfMO9SdCzeA4Q5AB0NUT7bC6D2zGhv89rmgtg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Wei, R. (2022). A Comparative Ecological Discourse Analysis of China's Image in Chinese and Foreign Media. Modern Foreign Languages, 45(3), 318–330.

https://link.cnki.net/urlid/44.1165.H.20220120.1503.002

Wu, J., & Li, Y. (2025). International Eco-discourse Analysis on the Basis of Transitivity System——An Exemplary Study of Joint Statement Between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. Foreign Language Research, (2), 34–42.

https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2025.02.005

Wu, J. G., Li, D. Q., & Zhang, H. S. (2021). Multimodal Translation of the Commentaries in Wild China and the Construction of National Image. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 42(5), 31–41.https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16482/j.sdwy37-1026.2021-05-004

Xiao, J. H. (1997). "Complement" and "Participant" in Functional Grammar. Journal of Foreign Languages, (6), 36–39.

https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=VQ0ntgfwFMT1ZeS8bssKdHQsVAmbDLrDAlo4FY70o5r_lNpleKHc1ZXhUvGfwqVtO-tUavaj_7Ul5aAE9n3FeTfE6SKPtlIQl9HEJ8brj8gYqlJcftNHDkno710p8adzKUsgaZmBmLsRd0LMDluDY6JgL75DB5-IUJ_pr2ZaONg=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 填静 胡 (Author)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.