5E学习环结合混合式教学模式于设计实作课程之创新教学与实践研究
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70693/cjst.v1i1.828Keywords:
5E学习环；混合教学；设计实作；教学创新；学习成效Abstract
在设计实作课程的教学现场常观察到问题包括有学生被动式参与教学活动、参与活动现场的体验不够、设计流程表达能力缺乏、设计想法无法转化为创意作品、设计创新评价不足等。在数位媒体普及化与防疫常态化影响下，面对面教学和远距网络教学两者相互混合的教学模式已逐渐受到大家接受与认可，传统单一线下教学模式已不能满足教学需求了。因此，本研究尝试导入5E学习环结合混合式教学模式至设计实作课程进行教学创新研究，研究方法采用问卷调查、访谈、参与观察，分析学生在自主学习、问题收敛、设计表达、实作验证以及设计评价五个面向调查。研究结果显示：1.学生普遍对5E学习环结合混合式教学模式较为认可，其中受到学生认可度较高依次是自主学习、实作验证和设计表达，但学生对问题收敛以及设计评价较缺乏明确表态；2.五个目标培养能力面向在课程的前后测量均值对比，整体呈现下降趋势，可能因样本数量较少，使统计数据不能真实反应，后续研究可透过样本数量增加，提升问卷可信度；3.访谈结果显示受访学生普遍认5E学习环结合混合式教学模式对学习成效有所帮助，并期待延续在其他课程上使用。
References
Skyba Y, Skyba S. Modeling the adaptation of educational programs of higher education institutions to the needs of the labor market in the conditions of martial law and the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine[J]. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Series 15 Scientific and Pedagogical Problems of Physical Cult, 2025, (3K(188)): 273-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31392/UDU-nc.series15.2025.03k(188).63
Griffin P, Care E, McGaw B. The Changing Role of Education and Schools[M]. In: Griffin P, McGaw B, Care E, editors. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5
Wan G, Gut D M, editors. Bringing Schools into the 21st Century[M]. The Explorations of Educational Purpose 13. Springer, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4
Luka I. Design Thinking in Pedagogy[J]. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2020, 5(2): 63-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20142.63.74
Scheer A, Noweski C, Meinel C. Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education[J]. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 2012, 17(3): 8-19.
Yu Z, Gao M, Wang L. The effect of educational games on learning outcomes, student motivation, engagement and satisfaction[J]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2020, 59(3): 522-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969214
Lee Y F, Hwang G J, Chen P Y. Impacts of an AI-based Chabot on college students' after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation[J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2022, 70(5): 1843-1865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8
Thomas H, Martina D. Application of cooperative learning model in increasing students’ motivation, learning participation and creativity[J]. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2022, 1(1): 314-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v1i1.55
Lamnina M, Chase C C. Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity, affect, learning, and transfer[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2019, 59: 101785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101785
Miryahyoyeva Mashxura, Ilhomjon Meliqo’ziyevich Siddiqov. Effects of the Flipped Classroom in Teaching Computer Graphics[J]. Eurasian Research Bulletin, 2023, 16: 119-123.
Jonassen D. Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Learning Outcomes[J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1997, 45(1): 65-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
Mynbayeva A, Sadvakassova Z, Akshalova B. Pedagogy of the twenty-first century: Innovative teaching methods[M]. New Pedagogical Challenges in the 21st Century - Contributions of Research in Education, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72341
Adedeji S B, Rahman M M, Abdul M B, et al. Innovative Teaching Methods and Entrepreneurship Education: A synthesised literature review[J]. Educational Administration Research and Review, 2020, 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/earr.v2i1.21713
Guo Y, Wang X, Gao Y, et al. Flipped online teaching of histology and embryology with design thinking: design, practice and reflection[J]. BMC Medical Education, 2024, 24(1): 388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05373-7
Wang Y. Teachers’ design thinking of instructional design in higher education[J]. The Educational Review, USA, 2023, 7(12): 1896-1900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2023.12.013
Li F. Mixed teaching mode for online and offline under COVID-19 epidemic situation[J]. Frontiers in Educational Research, 2022, 5(1): 16-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.050103
Bartkowiak G, Krugiełka A, Dama S, et al. Academic teachers about their productivity and a sense of well-being in the current covid-19 epidemic[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(9): 4970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094970
Bybee R W, Landes N M. Science for Life & Living: An elementary school science program from Biological Sciences Curriculum Study[J]. The American Biology Teacher, 1990, 52(2): 92-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4449042
Bybee R W, Taylor J A, Gardner A, et al. The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness[M]. A report prepared for the Office of Science Education, National Institutes of Health, 2006.
KU C H. Action Research on the Influence of the Integrate of Science Toys with the Inquiry Teaching on College Students' Inquiry Ability[M]. Department of Science Education and Application, National Taichung University of Education, Taiwan, 2021.
Ramdani A, Jufri A W, Gunawan G, et al. Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in terms of gender using science teaching materials based on the 5E learning cycle integrated with local wisdom[J]. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2021, 10(2): 187-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29956
Yuliana I, Kusairi S, Taufiq A, et al. The analysis of students’ problem-solving ability in the 5E learning cycle with formative e-assessment[M]. 28th Russian Conference on Mathematical Modelling in Natural Sciences, 2020.
Stamp N, O’Brien T. GK-12 partnership: A model to advance change in science education[J]. Bioscience, 2005, 55(1): 70-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0070:GPAMTA]2.0.CO;2
Utami D N, Subali B. 5E learning cycle combined with mind mapping in excretory system: Effectiveness on curiosity[J]. Biosfer, 2020, 13(1): 130-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n1.130-142
Fatimah I. The development of physics learning tools in vocational high school based constructivism approach using learning cycle 5E model[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, 1481(1): 012120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012120
Yuliana I, Kusairi S, Taufiq A, et al. The analysis of students’ problem-solving ability in the 5E learning cycle with formative e-assessment[M]. 28th Russian Conference on Mathematical Modelling in Natural Sciences, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000751
Suwito B, Handoyo B, Susilo S. The effects of 5E learning cycle assisted with spatial based population geography textbook on students’ achievement[J]. International Journal of Instruction, 2020, 13(1): 315-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13121a
Zetriuslita, Uswatun. The 5E Learning Cycle Model in an Effort to Foster Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills Viewed From Academic Level[M]. 2nd International Seminar on Applied Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ISAMME), 2020, 2-9 April. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012091
Rogers P C, Graham C R, Rasmussen R, et al. Case 2: Blending Face-to-Face and Distance Learners in a Synchronous Class: Instructor and Learner Experiences[J]. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2003, 4(3): 245.
Bonk C J, Graham C R. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Heflin H, Shewmaker J, Nguyen J. Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning[J]. Computers & Education, 2017, 107: 91-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
Ahmed F A. The relationship between self-directed learning readiness and online learning engagement among nursing students[J]. Helwan International Journal for Nursing Research and Practice, 2024, 3(5): 156-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/hijnrp.2024.230571.1086
Zhang H, Yang J, Liu Z. Effect of teachers’ teaching strategies on students’ learning engagement: moderated mediation model[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15: 1475048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1475048
Audas R, Willms J D. Engagement and dropping out of school: A life-course perspective[M]. Hull: Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada, 2001.
Marks H M. Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years[J]. American Educational Research Journal, 2000, 37: 153-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
Astin A W. Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education[J]. Journal of College Student Development, 1984, 25: 297-308.
Newmann F M. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools[M]. Teachers College Press, 1992, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.
Fredrick L D, Hummel J H. Reviewing the outcomes and principles of effective instruction[M]. Evidence-Based Educational Methods, 2004, 9-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012506041-7/50003-6
Wang L C, Chen M P. The effects of game strategy and preference-matching on flow experience and programming performance in game-based learning[J]. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2010, 47(1): 39-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525838
Pintrich P R, Smith D A F, Garcia T, McKeachie W J. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)[M]. MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, 1991. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338122)
Lai C L, Hwang G J. Effects of mobile learning time on students’ conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem-solving, meta-cognitive awareness and creativity[J]. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2014, 8(3): 276-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.067029
Gay R L, Mills G E, Airasian P W. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application[J]. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 2021, 3(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 贾希慧, 杜瑞泽
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
