建筑工程全过程管理风险识别与协同控制 ——基于57个官方公开风险事件的内容分析

Authors

  • 王维明 金乡县金思泉水务有限公司
  • 孔潇楠 金乡县金思泉水务有限公司
  • 贺敏 金乡县金思泉水务有限公司

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70693/cjst.v2i5.2108

Keywords:

建筑工程管理;全过程管理;风险识别;官方公开案例;敏感性分析;协同控制

Abstract

为识别建筑工程全过程关键风险及跨阶段关联,本文从30份法院、审计、事故调查和招投标监管等官方文件中拆分形成57个风险事件,构建五阶段、23类风险编码体系,并采用内容分析、探索性帕累托排序、来源去重敏感性检验、频次—影响评价和主次风险路径归纳。结果表明,施工实施与竣工验收结算阶段合计占59.7%;前11类风险累计占80.7%,但仅反映案例库内部结构。来源去重前后排序Spearman相关系数为0.950,工期失控、计价争议、工程款拖欠和结算久拖较稳定,质量缺陷排序受同源聚集影响。质量缺陷、工期失控、计价争议、工程款拖欠和安全防护不足为优先治理风险。18项盲法重复编码的阶段、主风险和影响等级Kappa分别为0.859、0.818和0.900。基于43项关联事件,提出阶段、目标、主体和信息四维协同控制框架。

References

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB/T 50326—2017 建设工程项目管理规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.

[2] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000:2018 Risk management—Guidelines[S]. Geneva: ISO, 2018.

[3] Zou P X W, Zhang G, Wang J. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2007, 25(6): 601-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001

[4] Ward S, Chapman C. Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2003, 21(2): 97-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1

[5] Assaf S A, Al-hejji S. Causes of delay in large construction projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, 24(4): 349-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010

[6] Doloi H, Sawhney A, Iyer K C, et al. Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2012, 30(4): 479-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004

[7] Pinto J K, Slevin D P, English B. Trust in projects: An empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2009, 27(6): 638-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.010

[8] Shrestha P P, Fathi M. Impacts of change orders on cost and schedule performance and the correlation with project size of DB building projects[J]. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2019, 11(3): 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000311

[9] Alkhattabi L, Alkhard A, Gouda A. Effects of change orders on the budget of the public sector construction projects in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia[J]. Results in Engineering, 2023, 20: 101628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101628

[10] Amin F, Khan K I A, Ullah F, et al. Key adoption factors for collaborative technologies and barriers to information management in construction supply chains: A system dynamics approach[J]. Buildings, 2022, 12(6): 766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060766

[11] Cerezo-narváez A, et al. The influence of knowledge on managing risk for success in complex construction projects: The IPMA approach[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(15): 9711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159711

[12] Suresh S, Olayinka R, Chinyio E, et al. Impact of knowledge management on construction projects[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Management, Procurement and Law, 2017, 170(1): 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.15.00057

[13] Flyvbjerg B. Survival of the unfittest: Why the worst infrastructure gets built—and what we can do about it[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2009, 25(3): 344-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp024

[14] Sanni-anibire M O, Mohamad Zin R, Olatunji S O. Causes of delay in the global construction industry: A meta-analytical review[J]. International Journal of Construction Management, 2022, 22(8): 1395-1407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1716132

[15] 国家机关事务管理局. 中央国家机关建设项目工程变更管理办法(试行)[EB/OL]. 2023-08-15[2026-07-13]. https://cwfwpt.ggj.gov.cn/zcfg/jjglzd/202308/P020230815615210105137.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

王维明, 孔潇楠, & 贺敏. (2026). 建筑工程全过程管理风险识别与协同控制 ——基于57个官方公开风险事件的内容分析. 中国科学与技术学报, 2(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.70693/cjst.v2i5.2108