Abstract
纳博科夫的蝶类学研究与文学创作交织，形成了独特的艺术视角。蝴蝶的多样性源于微小细节的差异，这一观察启发了他对文学细节的重视，形成激情与精确相互融合的特点。此外，蝴蝶的伪装与拟态现象启发纳博科夫运用戏仿手法构建一个既真实又虚幻的文学世界，展现出后现代主义的创作风格。蝴蝶象征着他对幸福的渴望，这种渴望延伸至笔下的人物和读者，形成独特的文学体验，深刻影响了其创作内容。这种跨学科的探讨，有助于更全面地理解纳博科夫的创作特色与思想深度。
References
[美]纳博科夫.固执已见[M].潘小松译.长春:时代文艺出版社，1998:104.
[美]纳博科夫.纳博科夫短篇⼩说全集[M].逢珍译.上海:上海译文出版社,2018.
[美]库尔特·约翰逊,史蒂夫·科茨.纳博科夫的蝴蝶:文学天才的博物之旅[M].丁亮,李颖超,王志良译.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2016:410.
Alec Brookes.“Butterflies in the Chthulucene: Reading Nabokov Geologically”.Russian Literature,2020,Vol.114-115: 85-104
[美]纳博科夫.洛丽塔:电影剧本[M].叶尊译.上海:上海译文出版社,2021:141.
[美]理查德·罗蒂.偶然、反讽与团结[M].徐文瑞译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
Newman, Daniel Aureliano. “Nabokov’s Gradual and Dual Blues: Taxonomy, Unreliability, and Ethics in ‘Lolita.’” Journal of Narrative Theory, vol. 48, no. 1, 2018, pp. 53–83.
[新]布赖恩·博伊德.纳博科夫传:美国时期（1940-1959）[M].刘佳林译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2019:364.
[美]纳博科夫.洛丽塔[M].主万译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005:492.
Larson, K. Maya.“Nabokov's 'Diabolical Task': Translation as Capture and Becoming-Butterfly”.Deleuze & Guattari Studies,2020,Vol.14(4): 585-603.
Nabokov, Vladimir.“Problems of Translation: Onegin in English”, in The Translation Studies Reader, 3rd edn, ed. Lawrence Venuti, New York: Routledge,2012, pp. 119.
PYLE, ROBERT MICHAEL. “Nabokov’s Butterflies.” The American Scholar, vol. 69, no. 1, 2000, pp. 95–110.
De la Durantaye, Leland.“Artistic Selection: Science and Art in Vladimir Nabokov.” Transitional Nabokov, edited by Will Norman and Duncan White, Peter Lang, 2009, pp55-66.
[美]纳博科夫.天赋[M].朱建迅,王骏译.上海:上海译文出版社,2018:115.
Zimmer, Dieter E."A Guide to Nabokov’s Butterflies and Moths, 2001". Stalking Nabokov, New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press, 2011, pp. 100-106.
[美]纳博科夫.说吧,记忆[M].陈东飙译.长春:时代文艺出版社,1998: 112－113.
[美]纳博科夫.看,那些小丑![M].吴其尧译.上海:上海译⽂出版社,2016:11.
MEYERS, JEFFREY. “The Bulldog and the Butterfly: The Friendship of Edmund Wilson and Vladimir Nabokov.”The American Scholar, vol. 63, no. 3, 1994, pp. 379–99.
Fet, Victor. “Notes on Nabokov's childhood entomology.” Fine Lines: Nabokov's Scientific Art, edited by Stephen H. Blackwell and Kurt Johnson, Yale UP, 2016, pp. 216-224.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 人文与社会科学学刊